Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Recap

Week 14, 2015 John Vs Matt



Hash Beats Hitters for Fourth Consecutive Win

 
 

Week 14

avatar
 
  • Hash
  • 8-6
  • Weekly Grade: A-
  • 128.84
 
avatar
 
  • Hitters
  • 7-7
  • Weekly Grade: B
  • 110.15
Cancel your winter plans, Hash, you're headed to the playoffs. With another win over Hitters, this time by a final score of 128.84 to 110.15, Hash clinches a spot in the postseason. Hash scores a lot against Hitters, and their average score in the series is 142.89 points, 131.4% of their total season average. Russell Wilson was the difference, picking up 45.20 points for Hash. The last time these teams met, Greg Olsen led with 33.40. This is the smallest margin of victory for Hash in two head-to-head matchups. They defeated Hitters 156.95 to 95.65 in Week 3.

Top Players

    • Russell Wilson
    • 45.20
  •  
    • Eli Manning
    • 37.65
  •  
    • Golden Tate
    • 28.94
  •  
    • Allen Hurns
    • 19.50

Smooth Moves by Hash

  • Russell Wilson put on one of the season's standout performances with 45.20 points this week. It was the week's highest point total, as well as the eighth-most points scored this season.
  • Golden Tate ranked ninth in the league in scoring with 28.94 points, his highest output of the season.
  • Allen Hurns overachieved by 53.3%, scoring 19.50 points against a projected 12.72.
  • Did you use any black magic this week? Hash was still able to pull out a win with only 4 of their 8 starters exceeding their projected points.
  • Perhaps this is how backups become starters. Hash won with three players on the bench that did not play this week.

Toyota Roster Tune-up

  • Fantasy Football is a mental sport. Using your brain is a great way to ensure success.
  • Left Rob Gronkowski on the bench, where he scored 18.70 points and surpassed his scoring projection by 81.9%, the highest percentage of any player on the team.
  • It's times like these when it's important to support your players when they're down. So move the mouse pointer away from the DROP button. The Cincinnati Bengals Defense scored a season-low 5.00 points, 40.0% of their projected 12.50, which is their lowest percentage of the year.
  • Even though Hitters lost, only 4 of their 8 starters scored less than their projected points.
  • With 4.90 points, Jordan Matthews scored only 38.6% of his 12.71 projected point total.

What If

  • If Hash played Hitters every week, they would be 9-5 this season.
  • Hash would have beaten 12 other teams besides Hitters this week.
  • Were they resting their players for this week? Hash would have defeated Hitters 158.90 - 70.85 had they played each other last week.
  • If they played the same schedule as Hitters, Hash would be 5-7.
  • Hash would be 110-100 if they played every team every week.
  • Besides Hash, Hitters would have been defeated by five other teams this week.
  • If they played the same schedule as Hash, Hitters would be 5-7.
  • Hitters would be 91-119 if they played every team every week.

Game Notes

  • Luck has not been with Hitters, as five of their seven losses have come when their opponent scores higher than their season average.
  • The manager of Hash was probably the person who destroyed the curve on every test in school. They scored 128.84 points against a projected 112.30 and beat their scoring projection for the seventh time this season, including the last three weeks in a row.
  • Eat. Sleep. Conquer. Repeat. Hash has won four games in a row, the longest current winning streak in the league.
  • Hash won by 18.69 points, covering the 11.87-point spread.
  • The WRs on Hash collectively had their best week of the season with 61.04 points.
  • John Brown scored 17.80 points against a projected 13.17 in the loss and has now beaten his projection in four straight games.
  • Hash is leveraging their draft well. This week they got 88.8% of their points from players they drafted.
  • The win saw Hash top their projected points, giving them a 6-1 record when beating their projection. Hitters also overachieved and falls to 5-3 when doing so.

No comments:

Post a Comment