Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Recap


Bullock Bulls Vs Hawks


Week 3

avatar
 
  • Hawks
  • 100 pts, 3-0
  • Weekly Grade
 
avatar
 
  • Bullock Bulls!
  • 95.05 pts, 2-1
  • Weekly Grade
Hawks earned their third consecutive win when they nudged past Bullock Bulls! 100.00 to 95.05. They got a lift from Todd Gurley II, who led the team with 37.90 points and Devonta Freeman who had 22.80. Hawks is making magic happen for their team, as they have the highest overall point total in the league this season by averaging 118.83 points per matchup. Bullock Bulls! stays in fifth place with a 2-1 record. Hawks stays undefeated and in first place after having knocked over The ONLY Bull (115.70 to 80.00) and Killer Beas (140.80 to 68.44).

Top Players

    • Todd Gurley II
    • 37.90
  •  
    • T.Y. Hilton
    • 28.30
  •  
    • Kareem Hunt
    • 25.30
  •  
    • Devonta Freeman
    • 22.80

Smooth Moves by Hawks

  • A win like that must feel great, Hawks. Know what feels better? Getting in the Toyota Hall of Fame.
  • The best week among all the bellcows: Todd Gurley II had an outstanding performance with 37.90 points, the best among RBs this week and the second-highest RB score in the league this season.
  • Devonta Freeman put the team on his back with 22.80 points, the seventh-highest score among RBs in the league this week.
  • Hawks won despite having only 3 of their 8 starters exceed their scoring projection.
  • Both of the starting RBs beat their projected point totals.

Toyota Roster Tune-up

  • It's OK, Bullock Bulls!. Losing happens. Not necessarily to Toyota Hall of Famers, but to other folks, sure.
  • Should have started Deshaun Watson, who beat his scoring projection with 23.15 points against a projected 11.62.
  • Picked up Ryan Griffin, who scored 17.10 points against a projected 8.55, but left him on the bench.
  • Whoever gave you this advice, you might want to lose their number. Picked up and started Ed Dickson, who then scored below his 8.14-point projection with 1.80 points.
  • The Baltimore Ravens Defense was last in the matchup in scoring with -4.00 points.

What If

  • If Hawks played Bullock Bulls! every week, they'd be 2-1 this year.
  • Hawks would have beaten eight other teams besides Bullock Bulls! this week.
  • Were they resting their players for this week? Hawks would have defeated Bullock Bulls! 140.80 - 110.55 had they played each other last week.
  • Hawks would be 2-0 if they played the same schedule as Bullock Bulls!.
  • Hawks would be 33-12 if they played every team every week.
  • Bullock Bulls! would have lost to eight other teams besides Hawks this week.
  • Bullock Bulls! would be 2-0 if they played the same schedule as Hawks.
  • If they played every team every week, Bullock Bulls! would be 31-14.

Game Notes

  • With a combined 60.70 points from the RB position, Hawks got the highest combined scoring output from the RB position for any team this season.
  • Don't you hate that person that always has to one-up everybody? Bullock Bulls! scored 95.05 points and lost. It is the fourth-highest losing score in the league this season.
  • At 4.95 points, the margin of victory was the tightest of the week.
  • Hawks took the W, even though Bullock Bulls! performed better against their scoring projection. Bullock Bulls! scored 89.5% of their 106.17 projected points, while Hawks recorded 85.5% of their 116.96-point projection.
  • Bullock Bulls! could not close out the win even with the help of T.Y. Hilton, who scored 28.30 points, the sixth-highest score among all WRs in the league for the week.
  • Even in the loss, the 25.30 points scored by Kareem Hunt was the fifth-highest score of any RB in the league this week.
  • Maybe pop in the tape of the best game of the season to feel better. Derek Carr had a season-low 2.40 points in the win against a projected 22.91 and scored below his projection for the first time this season.
  • Despite being on the winning team, Jeremy Maclin had a season-low 1.80 points against a projected 12.81 and underachieved for the second time this season.

No comments:

Post a Comment